| 翻訳と辞書 |
| Second Version of Triptych 1944 ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
Second Version of Triptych 1944
''Second Version of Triptych 1944'' is a 1988 triptych painted by the Irish-born artist Francis Bacon. It is a reworking of ''Three Studies for Figures at the Base of a Crucifixion'', 1944, Bacon's most widely known triptych, and the one which established his reputation as England's foremost post-war painters.
Bacon often painted second versions of his major paintings, including ''Painting (1946)'', which he reworked in 1971 when the original became too fragile to transport to exhibitions.〔"Farr217">Farr; Peppiatt; Yard, 217〕 In 1988, Bacon completed this near copy of the ''Three Studies''. At 78 × 58 inches, this second version is over twice the size of the original, while the orange background has been replaced by a blood-red hue. His reason for creating this rework remain unclear, although Bacon did say to Richard Cook that he "always wanted to make a larger version of the first (Studies... ). I thought it could come off, but I think the first is better. I would have had to use the orange again so as to give a shock, that which red dissolves. But the tedium of doing it perhaps dissuaded me, because mixing that orange with pastel and then crushing it was an enormous job."〔Cook, Richard. "Le portrait modern en Grande Bretange". ''Artstudio'', Paris, 21, Summer 1991. 50-57〕
The figures occupy a proportionally smaller space on the canvas than in the 1944 version, a presentation that, according to the Tate Gallery's catalogue, "plung() them into a deep void".〔"(Second Version of Triptych 1944 1988 )". Tate Gallery display caption, November 2005. Retrieved on 27 April 2007.〕 Critical opinion was mixed and the triptych drew criticism from those who felt that its more refined painting technique robbed the image of much of its power.〔Hyman, James. "(Francis Bacon - A Life in Paint )". James Hyman Fine Art, 2002. Retrieved on 27 April 2007〕 Denis Farr suggested that while the second version's larger scale gave it "a majestic quality which is highly effective", its svelte presentation lessened its shock value.〔 Critic Jonathan Meades felt that though the 1988 triptych was a more polished and painterly work, it lacked the rawness of the original.〔Meades, Jonathan. "Raw, Embarrassing, Nihilistic". ''New Statesman'', 6 February 1998.〕
==Notes==
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「Second Version of Triptych 1944」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|